





Please sign in before starting!!.
This project aims to improve AI-generated tissue masks in histology images containing adipose tissue. By reviewing and correcting these masks, volunteers help create better research data for digital pathology and biomarker discovery.
Each task shows a two-panel image:
You will compare these panels and decide whether the mask is clearly correct, missing a wall, or too hard to judge confidently.
No. You do not need previous medical or pathology training to take part. A short tutorial and examples will explain what to look for and how to annotate missing-wall cases.
Choose Clearly correct when the predicted mask already follows the visible tissue boundaries well enough that no meaningful correction is needed.
The mask does not need to be perfect. Small imperfections are acceptable.
Choose Missing-wall when a real tissue wall or septum is missing, broken, or misplaced in the predicted mask.
In these cases, you will:
Choose Hard / ambiguous when the tissue boundary is too unclear to judge confidently.
Examples include:
If you are unsure, choose Hard / ambiguous instead of guessing.
Thin adipocyte walls and connective septa count as tissue.
Empty adipocyte lumina do not count as tissue.
If a wall is slightly broken because of tissue preparation, it may still be corrected when its intended path is visually clear.
No. Volunteers are not being asked to diagnose cancer or make clinical decisions.
Your role is to help improve tissue annotations in histology images. These annotations may later support research into biomarkers related to diseases such as cancer.
Adipose tissue is easy to see in many biopsy images, but it is often overlooked. Its structure may contain useful biological information related to inflammation, tissue remodeling, and diseases such as cancer.
We are studying whether improved annotations of adipose tissue can help support the discovery of new biomarkers.
AI can analyze large numbers of images quickly, but it still makes mistakes. In adipose tissue, thin walls may appear broken or incomplete during tissue preparation, which can make automatic segmentation difficult.
Human review helps correct these errors and improve the quality of the data.
If you cannot judge the boundary confidently, choose Hard / ambiguous.
It is better to mark a case as uncertain than to guess.
Yes. Volunteer contributions help us improve tissue masks, create better datasets, and refine AI models. These improved annotations may also support research into new tissue-based biomarkers.
Some masks contain errors because the AI model can confuse broken or faint tissue walls with open spaces. This is one of the main challenges the project is trying to address.
No. Only mark the area that needs correction.
If the case is labeled Missing-wall, draw:
Do not redraw the full mask.
Cases marked as Hard / ambiguous can be separated from clearer examples and reviewed more carefully by the research team or by expert annotators.
Most tasks should take only a short time. Some images are easy to review, while others may require more careful attention.
Yes. This project is designed so that non-experts can contribute after a short introduction and tutorial.